THE Movement Against Disinformation (MAD) has expressed concern over accusations made against human rights lawyer Antonio La Viña, citing potential implications for the independence of the Philippine legal profession.
MAD, which La Viña leads, says the accusations have sparked fears of redtagging, a practice that can erode democratic discourse and intimidate individuals from exercising their rights.
La Viña has been a vocal advocate against disinformation and has defended journalists and activists against online redtagging.
Notably, he served as lead counsel for Gold Star Daily Editor-in-Chief Cong B. Corrales in a case against Meta (Facebook) over redtagging, arguing that unchecked redtagging can have serious consequences for individuals and society.
MAD cites the Supreme Court’s May 2024 ruling declaring redtagging a threat to constitutional rights, emphasizing the importance of protecting lawyers who fulfill their professional duties without fear of reprisal.
The group stresses that targeting a lawyer for doing their job undermines the constitutional right to counsel and the independence of the legal profession.
The incident has raised concerns over the safety of lawyers and the independence of the legal profession.
MAD and civil society groups call for accountability and truth, expressing solidarity with La Viña and others facing similar challenges.
They emphasize the need to protect the rights of lawyers, journalists, and activists to ensure a safe and democratic space for discourse.
Redtagging, a practice where individuals are labeled as “terrorist sympathizers,” has been condemned for its potential to lead to violence and rights violations.
The Supreme Court’s ruling highlights the need for vigilance against such practices, which can have far-reaching consequences for human rights and democracy.
