“I do not wish to talk about resilience,” the judge told a sea of graduates.
And for once, a commencement speech did not sound like a motivational poster.
“At some point, celebrating how fast we get up becomes a way of forgetting why we were knocked down in the first place.”
Exactly.
We have turned resilience into a national reflex.
Flood? Resilient.
Inflation? Resilient.
You may also like: Troops spread across Barmm hotspots ahead of Sept. polls
Oil price increase? Adjust.
System failure? Endure.
We did not start these crises.
We are not part of the wars that drive them.
We do not sit at the tables where decisions are made.
And yet, we pay for them.
Fuel prices rise halfway across the world, and jeepney drivers here recalibrate their day around it.
Transport fares shift. Food prices follow.
Households adjust — not because they chose to, but because they must.
We applaud survival and call it progress.
And the more we celebrate endurance, the less we interrogate the cause.
That arrangement, unsurprisingly, works very well for those in charge.
It is convenient to praise strength when fixing systems is harder.
Convenient to soften the blow instead of preventing the fall.
Convenient to subsidize pain rather than challenge its source.
Convenient to distribute relief instead of delivering reform.
Take ayuda for instance.
Emergency assistance is meant for emergencies. Yet it has evolved into something far more predictable — scheduled, photographed, and publicly narrated.
Relief goods arrive with tarpaulins.
Cash assistance arrives with attribution.
Gratitude is expected.
Accountability is negotiable.
I once saw people lining up outside what the politician’s mother proudly called “the mansion.”
The name was hers. The line was theirs.
The optics were flawless. The system, less so.
The difference between temporary relief and real mobility is not theoretical.
A one-time payout stretches a week. Sustainable capital access stretches a future.
When small businesses are funded, money begins to circulate. Income is generated. Credit histories are built. Options begin to exist.
But access to that kind of capital was never designed for everyone.
Those who need it least qualify for the best rates — and the biggest loans. Those who need it most are funneled elsewhere — toward micro-lenders with terms that do not lift them so much as keep them moving in place, only more indebted.
And so we return to the script.
Be resilient. Adjust. Endure.
It echoes a familiar kind of reassurance.
“At least it still works.”
“At least it still holds.”
“At least it still comes back.”
Comforting, perhaps.
But it quietly lowers the standard of what people should be willing to accept.
It redirects attention from failure to tolerance — from what broke to how well people absorbed the impact.
And tolerance, when repeatedly demanded, begins to look less like strength and more like surrender.
The judge was right to resist the language of silver linings.
There should come a time when resilience is no longer the headline — when systems protect instead of console, and outcomes improve instead of repeat.
Resilience is admirable when it is chosen.
It is deeply convenient when it is required.
A nation that keeps praising resilience is not celebrating strength.
It is revealing how much failure it has normalized — and how little it intends to change.
